On 08.02.2010 08:01, Syed Mohammed, Khasim wrote:
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Ben Warrenbiggerbadderben@gmail.com wrote:
Dirk,
On 2/5/2010 11:30 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
On 24.01.2010 01:05, Tom wrote:
Khasim Syed Mohammed wrote:
From 9bb1c3501c8f098dac6e224c99e409ebf92b0ab9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Syed Mohammed Khasimkhasim@ti.com Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:11:14 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Enable I2C bus switching
OMAP3 supports Multiple I2C channels, this patch allows us to use i2c dev<bus no> command to switch between busses.
Signed-off-by: Syed Mohammed Khasimkhasim@ti.com Acked-by: Heiko Schocherhs@denx.de
drivers/i2c/omap24xx_i2c.c | 5 +++++ include/configs/omap3_beagle.h | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/omap24xx_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/omap24xx_i2c.c index ff18991..e8c8184 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/omap24xx_i2c.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/omap24xx_i2c.c @@ -435,3 +435,8 @@ int i2c_set_bus_num(unsigned int bus)
return 0;}
+int i2c_get_bus_num(void) +{
return (int) current_bus;+} diff --git a/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h b/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h index a8abb0e..4d516a4 100644 --- a/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h +++ b/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h @@ -100,6 +100,12 @@ /* DDR - I use Micron DDR */ #define CONFIG_OMAP3_MICRON_DDR 1
+/* Enable Multi Bus support for I2C */ +#define CONFIG_I2C_MULTI_BUS 1
+/* Probe all devices */ +#define CONFIG_SYS_I2C_NOPROBES {0x0, 0x0}
Most/All of the configs I reviewed set the addr element to a valid address. I do not believe 0 is a valid address on omap. If the intent is a double negative {0, 0} == probe all Then add a comment.
I would fix this, but I have no idea what to add :( Any hint?
CONFIG_SYS_I2C_NOPROBES doesn't have to be defined. It's there as a convenience in case there are devices that you don't want to be included when probing the bus. If there's nothing you want to skip, don't define it.
With out this option enabled it fails to compile for Multi bus I2C support
Hmm, I removed CONFIG_SYS_I2C_NOPROBES as proposed by Ben and I haven't observed any warning compiling my three patches
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067541.html
More over, this patch is already accepted and has nothing more to do.
I'm not sure, but there seems to be a compilation warning in 2/7 or 3/7. At least in the unmodified ones. The three patches I sent (see above) are compiling fine now, though.
Best regards
Dirk