1 Feb
2011
1 Feb
'11
9:35 a.m.
On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:57 PM, V, Aneesh wrote:
Hi Vaibhav,
[...]
I guess you will hit a similar issue with the networking related code is used (I am not sure if SPL uses it). That also requires a decent size of bss.
Luckily we don't need networking related code in SPL.
It might be required later on :)
Is having a config option to specify the location of bss (like CONFIG_SYS_BSS_ADDR) better/acceptable?
I would prefer to have rest of the BSS in internal RAM itself.
Instead of adding workarounds for each driver I think putting BSS in SDRAM as pointed out by Wolfgang is better.
Regards, Vaibhav