In message FB3BAE941CB9B24782B2DE43D755BD89040CD818@ala-mail02.wrs.com you wrote:
In accordance with our last correspondence, I have made the following modifications to the attached patch, u-boot-1.1.1-Wr_SBC85xxPQ3.patch. This patch will upgrade u-boot-1.1.1 to support WindRiver's SBC8560/8540 PowerQUICCIII board.
Mostly added, thanks.
The parts NOT added are as follows:
diff -Naur ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/interrupts.c ./cpu/mpc85xx/interrupts.c --- ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/interrupts.c 2003-10-15 19:53:51.000000000 -0400 +++ ./cpu/mpc85xx/interrupts.c 2004-08-27 13:01:50.000000000 -0400
None of the other existing 85xx boards needs functions get_tbl() or set_tbl() like you do. Since interrupt handling is definitely not board dependent I would like to understand why you think you need this stuff while others can do without it.
diff -Naur ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.c ./cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.c --- ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.c 2004-04-18 17:45:44.000000000 -0400 +++ ./cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.c 2004-08-30 12:04:30.000000000 -0400 ...
diff -Naur ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.h ./cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.h --- ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.h 2004-04-18 17:45:44.000000000 -0400 +++ ./cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.h 2004-08-27 14:31:49.000000000 -0400 ...
Patches don't apply against CVS tree. Please clean up your code and resubmit new patch against top of tree in CVS.
diff -Naur ../u-boot-1.1.1/README ./README --- ../u-boot-1.1.1/README 2004-04-23 16:32:05.000000000 -0400 +++ ./README 2004-08-27 13:11:30.000000000 -0400
Please resubmit and keep lists sorted!
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk