
On 6/30/20 5:55 AM, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 3/20/20 3:10 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 01:53:16 -0400 Sean Anderson seanga2@gmail.com wrote:
Some of the debug messages in the clock subsystem can be made more informative by adding the clock name or adding the explicit error.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson seanga2@gmail.com
drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c | 24 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c b/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c index 71878474eb..d44df05680 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c @@ -237,8 +237,8 @@ static int clk_set_default_parents(struct udevice *dev, int stage) continue;
if (ret < 0) {
debug("%s: failed to reparent clock %d for
%s\n",
__func__, index, dev_read_name(dev));
debug("%s: failed to reparent clock %d for
%s (err = %d)\n",
__func__, index, dev_read_name(dev),
ret); return ret; } } @@ -295,8 +295,8 @@ static int clk_set_default_rates(struct udevice *dev, int stage) ret = clk_set_rate(&clk, rates[index]);
if (ret < 0) {
debug("%s: failed to set rate on clock index
%d (%ld) for %s\n",
__func__, index, clk.id,
dev_read_name(dev));
debug("%s: failed to set rate on clock index
%d (%ld) for %s (err = %d)\n",
__func__, index, clk.id,
dev_read_name(dev), ret); break; } } @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ ulong clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk) { const struct clk_ops *ops;
- debug("%s(clk=%p)\n", __func__, clk);
- debug("%s(clk=%p "%s")\n", __func__, clk, clk->dev->name); if (!clk_valid(clk)) return 0; ops = clk_dev_ops(clk->dev);
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ struct clk *clk_get_parent(struct clk *clk) struct udevice *pdev; struct clk *pclk;
- debug("%s(clk=%p)\n", __func__, clk);
- debug("%s(clk=%p) "%s"\n", __func__, clk, clk->dev->name); if (!clk_valid(clk)) return NULL;
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ long long clk_get_parent_rate(struct clk *clk) const struct clk_ops *ops; struct clk *pclk;
- debug("%s(clk=%p)\n", __func__, clk);
- debug("%s(clk=%p "%s")\n", __func__, clk, clk->dev->name); if (!clk_valid(clk)) return 0;
@@ -492,7 +492,8 @@ ulong clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, ulong rate) { const struct clk_ops *ops;
- debug("%s(clk=%p, rate=%lu)\n", __func__, clk, rate);
- debug("%s(clk=%p "%s", rate=%lu)\n", __func__, clk,
clk->dev->name,
if (!clk_valid(clk)) return 0; ops = clk_dev_ops(clk->dev);rate);
@@ -507,7 +508,8 @@ int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent) { const struct clk_ops *ops;
- debug("%s(clk=%p, parent=%p)\n", __func__, clk, parent);
- debug("%s(clk=%p "%s", parent=%p "%s")\n", __func__, clk,
if (!clk_valid(clk)) return 0; ops = clk_dev_ops(clk->dev);clk->dev->name, parent, parent->dev->name);
@@ -524,7 +526,7 @@ int clk_enable(struct clk *clk) struct clk *clkp = NULL; int ret;
- debug("%s(clk=%p)\n", __func__, clk);
- debug("%s(clk=%p "%s")\n", __func__, clk, clk->dev->name); if (!clk_valid(clk)) return 0; ops = clk_dev_ops(clk->dev);
@@ -584,7 +586,7 @@ int clk_disable(struct clk *clk) struct clk *clkp = NULL; int ret;
- debug("%s(clk=%p)\n", __func__, clk);
- debug("%s(clk=%p) "%s"\n", __func__, clk, clk->dev->name); if (!clk_valid(clk)) return 0; ops = clk_dev_ops(clk->dev);
Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski lukma@denx.de
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
*bump*
Is anything going to come of this?
Second *bump*. It looks like this is not going to end up in the clock tree. Can anyone else pick this up? Thanks.
--Sean