On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 14:34 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 01:53:53 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Mon 2015-12-14 13:20:28, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 12:51:16 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
[..]
I sense the overlapping partitions are a matter of taste here.
Just because trap is documented does not mean that it is not nasty. 199.95 pages to go.
Do you have a better idea how to satisfy both sets of people, ones which want kernel on a separate partition and ones which want to use single UBI volume then ?
If you expect people to read a comments explaining a situation, you can easily add an explanation and (commented out) alternative configutation that can be used.
I do not want to maintain multiple configurations, especially is there is known working alternative which covers all the usecases.
I believe the boot command will abstract these different use cases. We will have different command for qspiload_raw and qspiload which is the default that utilize ubifsload.
Thanks Chin Liang
Best regards, Marek Vasut