On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 08:15:34AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
On 22.6.2018 21:28, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On 22 June 2018 at 01:41, Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 18.6.2018 08:18, Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu wrote:
Added new variable ram_start to global data structure for holding the start address of first bank of RAM, and then use this ram_start for calculating ram_top properly. This patch fixes the erroneous calculation of ram_top incase of non zero ram start address. This patch also renames fdtdec_setup_memory_size() to fdtdec_setup_mem_size_start() as this routine now takes care of memory size and start.
Signed-off-by: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu siva.durga.paladugu@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com
Changes from v2:
- Used new varibale ram_start
- Rename fdtdec_setup_memory_size
Changes from v1:
- None
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/arm64-common.c | 2 +- board/emulation/qemu-arm/qemu-arm.c | 2 +- board/renesas/alt/alt.c | 2 +- board/renesas/blanche/blanche.c | 2 +- board/renesas/draak/draak.c | 2 +- board/renesas/eagle/eagle.c | 2 +- board/renesas/gose/gose.c | 2 +- board/renesas/koelsch/koelsch.c | 2 +- board/renesas/lager/lager.c | 2 +- board/renesas/porter/porter.c | 2 +- board/renesas/salvator-x/salvator-x.c | 2 +- board/renesas/silk/silk.c | 2 +- board/renesas/stout/stout.c | 2 +- board/renesas/ulcb/ulcb.c | 2 +- board/st/stm32f429-discovery/stm32f429-discovery.c | 2 +- board/st/stm32f429-evaluation/stm32f429-evaluation.c | 2 +- board/st/stm32f469-discovery/stm32f469-discovery.c | 2 +- board/st/stm32h743-disco/stm32h743-disco.c | 2 +- board/st/stm32h743-eval/stm32h743-eval.c | 2 +- board/xilinx/zynq/board.c | 2 +- board/xilinx/zynqmp/zynqmp.c | 2 +- board/xilinx/zynqmp_r5/board.c | 2 +- common/board_f.c | 4 ++-- include/asm-generic/global_data.h | 1 + include/fdtdec.h | 16 +++++++++------- lib/fdtdec.c | 3 ++- tools/patman/func_test.py | 2 +- tools/patman/test/0000-cover-letter.patch | 2 +- ...orrect-cast-for-sandbox-in-fdtdec_setup_memory_.patch | 4 ++-- tools/patman/test/test01.txt | 2 +- 30 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
[...]
sjg: Do you see any issue with this patch?
I think it is OK. Would like to get more people to look at it though.
I can't see the reason for fixing tools/patman but I will wait for you.
Changing patman tests is OK with me. Keeps thing consistent.
thanks Simon.
Tom: Do you see any issue with this change?
Yes, thanks. You can take it via your tree once Marek has had a chance to test things.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com