
29 Mar
2010
29 Mar
'10
12:44 p.m.
In message m2mxxreamw.fsf@ohwell.denx.de Detlev Zundel wrote:
may I ask if there is reason why merge commits don't have a summary?
Yes, you may. Actually this is a good question.
I find those summaries (enabled with git config [--global] merge.summary true) very hand to see what was changed with the merge commit.
I didn't even know about that feature, so thanks for poking us. Checking the documentation, it seems like the name will change soon however (man git-fmt-merge-msg):
merge.summary Synonym to merge.log; this is deprecated and will be removed in the future.
But apart from that, I also like the feature. Wolfgang, what do you think?
I have no preference.
If there is an agreement (or at least no protests) we can add 'merge.log'.
Shall we?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Prof: So the American government went to IBM to come up with a
data encryption standard and they came up with ...
Student: EBCDIC!