29 Jul
2008
29 Jul
'08
4:53 p.m.
Thanks. This won't apply against the net/testing branch because I've already removed a bunch of the other initializations. If you don't mind, I'll take care of this one along with many others in the coming few days.
Go ahead
Contradicting what I mentioned in another e-mail, this one does appear to make more sense as a cpu_eth_init, since all three (plus the new one) call only one MACB controller. Not a strong opinion, though, so if anybody wants it as board_eth_init, speak up.
Personnaly I prefer it in cpu_eth_init because it's cpu dependant not board dependant
Best Regards, J.