On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:26:11 +0100 Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
In message 200712111453.00849.vapier@gentoo.org you wrote:
Message body is too big: 40979 bytes with a limit of 40 KB
...
it's an automated message ... it isnt like Wolfgang is sitting there a rejecting each one
Oh, it *is* me. As a list moderator I have to NAK these manually. But the way I see it I can only be fair by NAKing all such requests. Even if the exceed the limit by just a single byte.
Then why don't you set it up to NAK such messages unconditionally?
What really pissed me off this time is that it was so obvious that you went in, looked at the message and rejected it explicitly even though it was only slightly above the limit and I specifically said in the introductory e-mail that this particular patch is hard to rebase.
Now, what do you want me to do? Shorten the log message? Remove some comments?
Haavard