11 Aug
2008
11 Aug
'08
8:17 p.m.
On Aug 11, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Becky Bruce wrote:
On Aug 11, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 11:29 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Use CONFIG_NUM_CPUS to match existing define used by 86xx.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org
common/cmd_mp.c | 4 ++-- cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c | 4 ++-- cpu/mpc85xx/release.S | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Jon Loeliger jdl@freescale.com
Not paying attention? I already sent a patch changing 86xx to match 85xx as we originally discussed, but this is also OK, as my patch hasn't been picked up.... Doesn't matter to me as long as it's consistent.
We discussed this on IRC and decided to use the 86xx name.
- k