
Lawrence R. Johnson wrote:
Jerry Van Baren wrote:
Larry Johnson wrote:
[snip]
- switch (type) {
- case DDR2:
printf("RAS to CAS delay min %d", data[29] >> 2);
switch (data[29] & 0x03) {
case 0x0: puts(".00 ns\n"); break;
case 0x1: puts(".25 ns\n"); break;
case 0x2: puts(".50 ns\n"); break;
case 0x3: puts(".75 ns\n"); break;
}
break;
Hmm, another troika that could be refactored into a helper subroutine. On second thought, this is probably not worth a helper routine (too trivial?): replacing the switch statements with arithmetic is going to be slightly less speed efficient, but quite a bit more code efficient:
printf(".%02d ns\n", (data[29] & 0x03) * 25);
[snip]
Doh! I must have been stuck in switch-statement mode.
You were set up on that one! :-D
Thanks again, gvb
You have inspired me to go ahead with the refactoring. I'm running MAKEALLs on my changes, and will post them when they come out OK. I plan to create the patch against my original submission, which should make the changes easier to follow.
Best regards, Larry
Always a good plan, make it work before optimizing. DAMHIKT :-/
gvb