4 Nov
2011
4 Nov
'11
9:31 p.m.
On 11/04/2011 03:07 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
For now, until we decide to do something SPL-wide, call it what you want.
Well basically from what I see, you'd like me to do the NAND/OneNAND merge. As I already said, that's way out of the scope of this patchset so I'm not doing that.
Oh, I didn't mean to imply that was within the scope of this patch. I was just describing the background behind why I'm frustrated with the OneNAND situation, and this looked like an extension of the "onenand is a totally different thing" model, in an independent context.
Well I suppose this is rooted in Linux. It's different subsys there too.
Either way, are you OK with current state of the patch?
I won't block it.
That's what I meant.
-Scott