Hi Marek,
marek.vasut@mailbox.org wrote on Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:56:41 +0100:
On 2/23/23 08:17, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Hello Marek & Ralph,
marek.vasut@mailbox.org wrote on Thu, 23 Feb 2023 01:12:49 +0100:
On 2/22/23 20:32, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 07:45:45PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 2/22/23 19:32, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 06:47:44PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > Are those fixes in mainline Linux ?
Yes, they are in mainline: 2dee50ab9e72 clk: renesas: r9a06g032: Fix UART clkgrp bitsel merged into 6.0, and also backported to earlier LTS branches 2a6da4a11f47 clk: renesas: r9a06g032: Fix the RTC hclock description merged into 5.19, seems to be missing from LTS branches
Use Linux 6.2.y as a base then.
Okay, done.
>> And please submit the missing patches for LTS branch inclusion too if >> possible, I guess they were missing Fixes: tag ?
Seems it was part of a series which added support for the RTC device: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220421090016.79517-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com... Since it is new feature, I guess one could argue that the clock table > fix is not needed in older LTS kernels, since no driver uses that clock. But most likely it was just overlooked. I'll check with Miquel.
Much appreciated, thanks !
+CC Miquel
As Ralph rightly pointed out, even though the clock description was wrong there was no user at that time so I did not bother with a Fixes tag. Anyhow, as the change does only impact the RTC clock, it should be harmless to backport if you want.
Either way is fine by me, I just want to be sure the u-boot clock tables are in sync with Linux as much as possible, and can be easily resynced in the future, that's all.
Of course. The fix is mainline already, so on that regard we should be fine.
Thanks, Miquèl