-----Original Message----- From: Horia Geanta Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 8:03 PM To: Laurentiu Tudor laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com; Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhushan@nxp.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prabhakar Kushwaha prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com; York Sun york.sun@nxp.com Cc: Alison Wang alison.wang@nxp.com; Ruchika Gupta ruchika.gupta@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] armv8: ls1046a: setup SEC ICIDs and fix up device tree
On 7/30/2018 4:58 PM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
The only way to implement a *mechanism* is to provide different ICIDs for all the blocks. Any other solution would be imposing a *policy*, thus restricting user's possibilities. Admittedly there are use cases less "popular" than others, but if possible it would be best not to decide for the user and
provide full flexibility.
Is there a resource (ICID values) shortage?
No. I can change the patch to have distinct ICIDs and resubmit. Please let me know if you agree on this.
Yes, please assign separate ICIDs for each.
Thanks -Bharat
Yes, this is my suggestion. IIUC it's also similar to the way LIODNs are allocated on PPC. True, LS102x is the exception - it assigns ICID 0x10 to all SEC blocks.
Regards, Horia