
Hi Filip,
On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 12:43, Filip Žaludek filip.zaludek@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Simon, Michal, Marek,
On 4/26/23 03:04, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Filip,
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 06:36, Filip Žaludek filip.zaludek@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 4/19/23 03:49, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Filip,
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 at 14:24, Filip Žaludek filip.zaludek@oracle.com wrote:
On 2/8/23 20:01, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 19:45:36 +0100 > From: Michal Suchánek msuchanek@suse.de > > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 05:01:12PM +0100, Filip Žaludek wrote: >> >> >> Hi Michal, >> >> thanks for testing! Do you consider keyboard as working once it is detected without >> 'usb_kbd usb_kbd: Timeout poll on interrupt endpoint', or judging from subsequent >> typing? Note that issue is reproducible only in about 20% of reboots. > > I rely on keyboard input to boot so if it was 20% broken I would notice. > I don't use the rPi all that much so if it was broken only a few > % of the time there is a chance I would miss it. > > However, for me not typing on the keyboard during usb detection it is > 100% not detected, typing on it during usb detection it is 100% > detected. > > The timeout is limitation of the dwc2 controller handling of usb hubs. > > There might be a possibility to improve the driver so that it handles > the condition but it might be that the Linux driver relies on a separate > thread handling the controller which is not acceptable for u-boot. > > I am not usb expert and definitely not dwc2 expert so I cannot do more > than workaround the current driver limitation. > >> For me I can always enter 'U-Boot>' shell, but then keyboard usually does not work. >> And yes, resetting the usb controller with pressing a key afterwards will >> finally break the keyboard. ('usb reset' typed from keyboard) >> If you are Prague located I am ready to demonstrate what I am talking about. >> >> Simon's keyboard detection is somewhat interfered by 'SanDisk USB Extreme Pro' detection, >> printed complaints but keyboard still works.. >> 'usb_kbd usb_kbd: Timeout poll on interrupt endpoint' and 'Failed to get keyboard state from device 0c40:8000' >> Btw. why from 0c40:8000 (ELMCU 2.4GHz receiver) when wired keyboard is 046d:c31c (Logitech Keyboard K120)? >> >> What is supposed scenario for RPi3/u-boot/grub usb keyboard equipped users wanting to boot non-default? >> Enter 'U-Boot>' shell to detect keyboard; type boot; select desired grub entry..? >> >> Reverting either from the two makes it non issue for me: >> 'dwc2: use the nonblock argument in submit_int_msg' >> commit 9dcab2c4d2cb50ab1864c818b82a72393c160236 > > Without this booting from USB is not feasible because reading every > block from the USB drive waits for the keyboard to time out. > >> 'console: usb: kbd: Limit poll frequency to improve performance' >> commit 96991e652f541323a03c5b7e075d54a117091618 > > No idea about this one, for me it doea not give any substantial > difference in behavior.
Reverting that commit leads to a significant slowdown loading a kernel from disk with a usb keyboard connected. The slowdown is somewhat hardware dependent but on some systems loading the OpenBSD/arm64 kernel would take minutes instead of seconds.
More updates to usb keyboard/RPi3/dwc2 controller issue:
I was following my former observation about printing characters from semi random places [usb.c, usb_hub.c, device.c, usb-uclass.c, dwc2.c] what works as workaround. I realized this is only when printing to vidconsole, not to serial. After disabling video_sync() and/or flush_dcache_range() from corresponding vidconsole print functions, printing is no longer workaround. This behavior seem to be due to cache coherency.
Do you have any objections against elephant in porcelain proposal? Not able to narrow it down more to single source code line. With this keyboard works for me even when touching it only during 15s grub timeout. It is not for sure that cache coherency problem is from dwc2, but afaik there are no other complaints to usb keyboard. Performance degradation not observed..
%< ------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c b/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c index 23060fc369..f95314ff1b 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c @@ -814,6 +814,7 @@ static int dwc_otg_submit_rh_msg(struct dwc2_priv *priv, struct usb_device *dev, else stat = dwc_otg_submit_rh_msg_out(priv, dev, buffer, txlen, cmd);
flush_dcache_all(); mdelay(1);
We have dma_map_single() and dma_unmap_single() which are designed for this. If you put these into the two functions that are called immediately above, perhaps that will solve the problem.
return stat;
%< -------------------------------------------------------------
Hello, I am about to dig more into this issue with proper tools, but failed to configure/compile trace functionality on RPi3 due to missing references to timer_early_get_count() and timer_early_get_rate().
You could implement a proper timer driver for rpi.
Is it possible/feasible to implement calls in CONFIG_SYS_ARCH_TIMER
and/or CONFIG_SP804_TIMER?
Yes
I am little bit missing here secret sauce, timer_early_get_count() and timer_early_get_rate() are not supposed to be implemented in arch/arm/cpu/armv8/generic_timer.c? But predestined for drivers/timer/sp804_timer.c?
TIMER is required for common/board_f.c and common/board_r.c but it disables generic_timer.. %< ----------------------------------------- ifndef CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)TIMER obj-$(CONFIG_SYS_ARCH_TIMER) += generic_timer.o endif %< ----------------------------------------- And obviously multiple definition of get_tbclk and get_ticks when forced to compile/link.
It seems from the above that if TIMER is enabled for a particular U-Boot build phase, then generic_timer is not, and vice versa. I suppose that is fair enough.
Sorry, it was imprecisely formulated question from me. I was expecting answer confirming and advocating sp804 is superior to System Timer. Implementing EARLY_TIMER for System Timer is trivial, sp804 requires research from my side. Skimming TF-A project sp804 seems superior.
Yes, implementing that as a timer driver seems fine to me. But we often have multiple drivers so I suppose some people will use the generic one if sp804 is not available.
I would be grateful even for trace to generate function traces without
timestamps. Is such nasty hack without timestamping supposed to work? Basically my intention is to trace 'usb reset'.
Appreciate any hints/outlines how to proceed.
I assume you mean CONFIG_TRACE. Yes, you could update it to support writing a zero timestamp. See the add_ftrace() function.
But better to add a driver if you can. It should not be difficult.
Regards, Simon
I am already happily timestamp tracing with borrowed functionality from generic_timer.c, albeit bypassing kbuild mechanism. It did not yet answered my usb polling questions, tracing report is polluted/overfilled.
Instrumenting code thoughts:
- It would be handy to -finstrument-functions only for desired objects.
The compiler probably doesn't support that, or at least we don't support passing different compiler args to each file in U-Boot, other than by manually hacking the Makefiles.
But I wonder if we could have a list of wildcards to match against the function names?
- It would be handy to have macro inverse to 'notrace' to mark only desired functions. Feasible?
- gcc -finstrument-functions-exclude-file-list still pollutes tracing buffer.
I wonder why? You could check whether the filename includes a full path, or something like that, so that it doesn't match. There will be a reason.
Please take my Instrumenting code comments with grain of salt, only as user report. Some doc pages track suggestions and whishlists how to make life easier..
Sure...people using a feature are always going to have ways to tidy it up / improve it. So I encourage you to take a look.
More Tracing in U-Boot thoughts:
- There is proftool options discrepancy, documented {-c, -f, -m, -o, -t, -v}, implemented {-m, -p, -t, -v}.
- Both types FUNCF_ENTRY and FUNCF_EXIT are marked as " <- " by proftool.
Yes, please send a patch or two to clean these up.
Regards, Simon
I will try to allocate spare time cycles to work on this, albeit with low priority.
OK
Regards, Simon