On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:17:47 +0200 Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Dear "V, Aneesh",
In message FF55437E1F14DA4BAEB721A458B6701706C58885A2@dbde02.ent.ti.com you wrote:
Presently, we are maintaining a mini bootloader(called x-loader, based on u-boot)separately. We want to integrate x-loader with u-boot and up-stream the source code.
That would be greatly appreciated.
This looks promising. However, our SPL has to load u-boot from MMC. Is it OK to keep it under nand_spl directory or should we create something like 'mmc_spl'?
Fr now we can stick with the nand_spl name (even if it's becoming a bit misleading);
I'd rather just change the name now -- misleading is bad whether there's one exception or several.
if other use cases get added we can discuss to rename it.
Someone just internally posted a patch adding "i2c_spl", FWIW.
-Scott