2 Mar
2020
2 Mar
'20
4:50 a.m.
On 3/1/20 9:27 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Sean,
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 5:06 AM Sean Anderson seanga2@gmail.com wrote:
Explicitly cast fdt_addr_t to a void pointer, since we pass it to readl.
Explicitly cast => Change?
As what the patch does
The compiler was giving a warning since readl expects a pointer but fdt_addr_t is typedef to some numeric type. This patch doesn't change the variable we get from the fdt subsystem to a void pointer, but it does change the base address we store to one.
--Sean