Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/03/2017 04:17 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/01/2017 05:36 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
This reverts commit b63b46313ed29e9b0c36b3d6b9407f6eade40c8f.
The Cadence QSPI device does not work with caching (introduced with the bounce buffer in this commit) on the Altera SoC platform.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Rush jason.rush@gd-ms.com
Do we really need the reverts or can we just fix the commit(s) up somehow ?
Would you prefer I squash the 2 reverts and the subsequent patch together as a single commit?
I would prefer if you answered my question :) So let me re-iterate, can we incrementally fix the driver instead of doing the revert(s) ?
I think I misunderstood your question. Could you clarify what you mean by incrementally fix the driver?
Are you asking if there is a way to fix the cache issue with the CQSPI on the Altera SoC platform? If so, I don't know if I have the knowledge to answer that. Do you have any suggestions on where one would start looking to fix the caching problem?
Just so we have a common understanding, the reverts along with the subsequent patches get the CQSPI device working again on the Altera SoC as it used to in previous versions of U-Boot, and the CQSPI should continue to work for the TI devices Vignesh's patches were intended to fix.
Regards, Jason