
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:01:20PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Dear Fabio Estevam,
In message 1363228354-29534-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com you wrote:
From: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com
Add initial support for Wandboard.
Subject and commit message are redundant, resulting in text like this:
Add initial support for Wandboard dual lite and solo. Add initial support for Wandboard.
Please remove the second line.
Thanks for the review. I will address your comments and send v5 after the nitrogen patches are applied into u-boot.imx.
+#define CONFIG_BOOTDELAY 1
Is there any reason for not chosing the more standard 5 second delay?
Ok, so let's go with 3 seconds then ;-)
There's a pretty even distribution of 1 3 and 5 second delays (with a few 10s, 2s and 6s). If they want 1, let them have 1, it's not hard to break into, you have U-Boot starting + 1sec.