On 18.01.19 14:03, Anup Patel wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Alexander Graf [mailto:agraf@suse.de] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 5:22 PM To: Anup Patel Anup.Patel@wdc.com; Rick Chen rick@andestech.com; Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com; Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@ni.com; Lukas Auer lukas.auer@aisec.fraunhofer.de; Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Cc: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@sifive.com; Paul Walmsley paul.walmsley@sifive.com; Atish Patra Atish.Patra@wdc.com; Christoph Hellwig hch@infradead.org; U-Boot Mailing List <u- boot@lists.denx.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] net: macb: Fix GEM hardware detection
On 18.01.19 12:19, Anup Patel wrote:
From: Atish Patra atish.patra@wdc.com
Fix MID bit field check to correctly identify all GEM hardwares.
The check is updated as per macb driver in Linux location: <linux_sources>/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c:259
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra atish.patra@wdc.com
This is missing your SoB.
Sure, I will add my SoB.
Since the work was done by Atish independently, I thought my SoB is not required.
Imagine the SoB as a marker for "this went through my hands". If you send a patch from someone else - even though you did modify a single line - it still went through your hands and thus your SoB should occur at the end.
Similarly the first SoB usually means "this was the original author".
So imagine you started to work on a patch, then Atish improved it and eventually you send it out, the SoB chain would look like this:
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel Anup.Patel@wdc.com Signed-off-by: Atish Patra atish.patra@wdc.com Signed-off-by: Anup Patel Anup.Patel@wdc.com
But you don't have to be too nit-picky about that part. The one thing people will care about is that the original author is in the SoB list and that your SoB is at the end of the list, because you are the one sending the patch set.
Alex