On 9/9/20 3:46 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 7:05 PM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 9/9/20 3:55 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:15 AM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 9/8/20 5:45 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 7:13 PM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 9/8/20 3:44 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 3:14 PM Chunfeng Yun chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com wrote: >> >> Use readx_poll_sleep_timeout() to poll the register status >> >> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com >> --- >> v3: no changes >> >> v2: fix typo of title suggested by Frank >> --- >> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 25 +++++++++++-------------- >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> > > Reviewed-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com
Thanks. So now I have half of a RESEND patchset with RB tags, and another half of just RB tags without patchset. Can someone of you please collect the tags and resend the patchset once more with the collected tags, so it's all in one place ?
I believe the latest version has all the RB tags.
Thank you, I cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox, because the original patches are just not there.
You can use patchwork to help the custodian work. I found it very helpful to download the patches from patchwork and apply.
Can you also comment on patches via patchwork ?
I mean, really, can we please just stick to the usual workflow ? That's all I am asking for , nothing else, nothing new.
I don't understand the question about "usual workflow". You asked "I cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox" and I recommended patchwork which will satisfy the requirement of what you asked.
Right, I can, but if there is more I want to say about the patch, I cannot do it with patchwork. Then I need the patch, which I don't have. Hence my remark about the usual email-based workflow.