6 Jul
2011
6 Jul
'11
7:27 p.m.
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:42:52 +0200 Simon Schwarz simonschwarzcor@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your feedback!
I will address the style problems - didn't run checkpatch for the RFC
- sorry my fault.
Why are you writing to NAND as part of bootm?
If you just want access to the results of the FDT/ATAG preparation that bootm does, consider using the bootm subcommands to prepare them, then normal U-Boot commands to write to NAND.
Hm thats a point. I see this as a feature as it saves new settings without the need of special commands
But that's not what bootm is for. If you're doing something new, it should be in a new command -- or in a script of existing commands.
-Scott