
Hi Ibai, Michal,
I had half-written a review of this patch and patch 4. Unfortunately I didn't finish them before they got applied. I'll send them now anyway, they are mostly nitpicking but you might consider them for a future improvement. Sorry for the inconvenience.
On 02/10/19 15:39, Michal Simek wrote:
From: Ibai Erkiaga ibai.erkiaga-elorza@xilinx.com
ZynqMP mailbox driver implementing IPI communication with PMU. This would allow U-Boot SPL to communicate with PMUFW to request privileged operations.
Signed-off-by: Ibai Erkiaga ibai.erkiaga-elorza@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com
...
+static int zynqmp_ipi_probe(struct udevice *dev) +{
- struct zynqmp_ipi *zynqmp = dev_get_priv(dev);
- struct resource res;
- ofnode node;
- debug("%s(dev=%p)\n", __func__, dev);
- /* Get subnode where the regs are defined */
- /* Note IPI mailbox node needs to be the first one in DT */
- node = ofnode_first_subnode(dev_ofnode(dev));
- if (ofnode_read_resource_byname(node, "local_request_region", &res)) {
dev_err(dev, "No reg property for local_request_region\n");
return -EINVAL;
- };
- zynqmp->local_req_regs = devm_ioremap(dev, res.start,
(res.start - res.end));
- if (ofnode_read_resource_byname(node, "local_response_region", &res)) {
dev_err(dev, "No reg property for local_response_region\n");
return -EINVAL;
- };
- zynqmp->local_res_regs = devm_ioremap(dev, res.start,
(res.start - res.end));
- if (ofnode_read_resource_byname(node, "remote_request_region", &res)) {
dev_err(dev, "No reg property for remote_request_region\n");
return -EINVAL;
- };
- zynqmp->remote_req_regs = devm_ioremap(dev, res.start,
(res.start - res.end));
- if (ofnode_read_resource_byname(node, "remote_response_region", &res)) {
dev_err(dev, "No reg property for remote_response_region\n");
return -EINVAL;
- };
- zynqmp->remote_res_regs = devm_ioremap(dev, res.start,
(res.start - res.end));
remote_req_regs and remote_res_regs are not used, why adding them in DT?
Should there be a good reason to keep them, I think the above code could be reorganized to avoid code duplication (assuming binary size of a bootloader still matters nowadays).