Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Marek Vasut marek.vasut@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/01 16:01:56:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Dear Mike Frysinger,
On Thursday, October 21, 2010 17:10:31 Graeme Russ wrote:
On 22/10/10 06:51, Mike Frysinger wrote: > have u-boot return an error.
Is NULL what you consider to be an error
yes
Besides, is not free(NULL) valid (does nothing) as well?
yes, free(NULL) should work fine per POSIX -mike
Well then, this patch wasn't accepted yet and I consider it OK to apply. Any objections?
There was a long debate on the list regarding this where I argued that malloc(0) should not be an error and malloc should return a ptr != NULL I guess that is why it hasn't been applied.
Jocke
Ok, let's restart. Is there any objection why malloc(0) should not return NULL in uboot?
Yes, read the thread to see why.
Well I did, that's why I have no objections to applying this patch
Is it coliding with any spec?
No, both are valid.
Jocke
Best regards, Marek Vasut