In message 4146DDA4.5070009@intracom.gr you wrote:
It's a discussion related to the kernel. Its mainly private email exchanges.
I really like this new trend in Free Software development :-(
The interesting public mailing lists (linuxppc) get shut down, and discussions about future kernel developments take place on IRC or "private email exchanges" only.
If you don't happen do be chosen for such elitist circles you cannot participate in kernel development any more.
This is not my idea of how things should be done.
The consensus is that there is no consensus for anything but the fact that something like this is needed.
The other solution discussed is bi_recs.
I will not comment on things I have no chance to get an opinion about.
If you take a look at the patch you'll see that the environment is not passed in the command line.
Merely a memory structure in a non-overwrittable area is created and the (physical) address of it is passed to the kernel.
There is no kernel interface for such stuff in existing Linux kernels (at least as far as they are accessable by mere mortals). There is not even a definition of "non-overwrittable area".
As long as there is no agreement how the Linux kernel will handle these issues (and with "Linux kernel" I mean what you get at kernel.org, and what works at least on ARM, MIPS and PowerPC) I do not want to add this to U-Boot.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk