Dear Jon,
in message 1090252402.10358.21.camel@blarg.somerset.sps.mot.com you wrote:
Right. The first message was rejected as being too large.
Oops? I received it through the list, and it made it into the archives. I don't think it was rejected.
I broke it into two parts that do the same patch and resubmitted it with a -1 and a -2 suffix.
So message 2 + message 3 is the same content as message 1?
The subject says "for TLB/DDR".
Yes, I rewrote the TLB and DDR handling.
...and some other things, whichlook unrelated to me.
Changesets that contain different, unrelated modifications shall be submitted as SEPARATE patches, one patch per changeset.
They aren't really unreleated. For example, there were missing TLB entries for PCI address spaces that were added. The removal of the molding options was specifically to clean up the TLBs.
OK, but which of these has anything to do with that:
* Made MPC8540/8560ADS be 33Mhz PCI by default. ... * Removed moldy CONFIG_RAM_AS_FLASH, CFG_FLASH_PORT_WIDTH_16 and CONFIG_L2_INIT_RAM options. ... * Moved board specific PCI init parts out of CPU directory.
?
To make this short: which of your 3 messages shall be added?
Please add all of them as they all apply and are important.
This makes NO sense to me. If I apply the first patch, the other two (part 1 and 2) will not apply any more.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk