17 May
2013
17 May
'13
6:48 p.m.
Tom,
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
I think my email must have been lost in the shuffle, see http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/240687/
So yes, I've got another fix in mind that should solve this and some other problems.
Saw your reply but don't completely understand it. I think we'd still like U-Boot to populate the memory property if possible and it sounds like your patch would prevent that. One reason is that we'd like to be able to handle different memory configurations (one of which is 3.5G) with a single binary and have U-Boot just tell the kernel how much space there is.
-Doug