
On 02/09/2017 05:43 PM, Konstantin Porotchkin wrote:
On 02/09/2017 06:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 02/09/2017 04:54 PM, Konstantin Porotchkin wrote:
On 02/09/2017 05:36 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 02/09/2017 04:30 PM, Konstantin Porotchkin wrote:
On 02/09/2017 03:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 02/09/2017 12:32 PM, kostap@marvell.com wrote: > From: Konstantin Porotchkin kostap@marvell.com > > The USB device should linked to VBUS regulator through
"vbus-supply"
> DTS property. > This patch adds handling for "vbus-supply" property inside the USB > device entry for turning on the VBUS regulator upon the host
adapter
> probe. > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Porotchkin kostap@marvell.com > Cc: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de > Cc: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de > Cc: Nadav Haklai nadavh@marvell.com > Cc: Neta Zur Hershkovits neta@marvell.com > Cc: Igal Liberman igall@marvell.com > Cc: Haim Boot hayim@marvell.com > --- > Changes for v5: > - Extended clocks description in documentation > - Removed print for regulator not found case > > doc/device-tree-bindings/usb/marvell.xhci-usb.txt | 29 > +++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/usb/host/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/usb/host/xhci-mvebu.c | 13 +++++++++- > 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644
doc/device-tree-bindings/usb/marvell.xhci-usb.txt
> > diff --git a/doc/device-tree-bindings/usb/marvell.xhci-usb.txt > b/doc/device-tree-bindings/usb/marvell.xhci-usb.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..6cc370c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/doc/device-tree-bindings/usb/marvell.xhci-usb.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ > +Marvell SOC USB controllers > + > +This controller is integrated in Armada 3700/8K. > +It uses the same properties as a generic XHCI host controller > + > +Required properties : > + - compatible: should be one or more of: > + - "marvell,armada3700-xhci", "generic-xhci" for Armada 37xx
SoCs
> + - "marvell,armada-8k-xhci", "generic-xhci" for Armada A8K SoCs > + - reg: should contain address and length of the standard XHCI > + register set for the device. > + - interrupts: one XHCI interrupt should be described here. > + > +Optional properties: > + - clocks: reference to a platform clocks that should be > enabled/configured > + upon interface initialization. May not exist on all platforms.
This is probably block clock then ?
Otherwise, Acked-by: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de
Otherwise the the internal SoC clock does not require
gating/muxing or
any other configuration for making this USB host adapter running. Not sure if I understood your question well.
Well, do these clock drive the USB block or do they drive the
register
interface or what ?
This entry is generic and applicable to all XHCI controllers, so it is hard to answer your question. It supposes to be a clock that drives
the
data transfer. It can be directly connected to the internal clock generator and divider or pass though an additional gate/mux. In the
last
case it can be inhibited or redirected.
So it's a PHY clock then ? Or XHCI block clock ?
marvell.xhci-usb.txt probably doesn't contain generic stuff, but marvell XHCI implementation specific stuff, right ?
No, in this particular case this entry is generic. That is why I proposed to remove it in the past. For the purpose of mvebu XHCI driver this entry is not required. In general and in Marvell case particularly, every unit is driven by some kind of internal clock.
And those internal clock can never ever be gated ? That's some odd design, I would not expect that on an advanced ARM chip ... I guess marvell is not power conscious ? :) The example contradicts what you just said though, it points into some clock module ...