4 Nov
2011
4 Nov
'11
3:14 a.m.
On Wednesday 02 November 2011 11:13:31 Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
I just ran over this old posting again:
09/10/2008 Ricardo Ribalda D [PATCH] I2C EEPROM simulator v2 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/46964
We never accepted this for U-Boot mainline, but in the context of the Sandbox environment it might be interesting again.
What do you think?
Yes I think it is interesting. Both Mike and I have done a SPI EEPROM implementation which is file-backed, whereas this has CONFIG-defined data.
we've done a SPI flash backend. i recall the EEPROM layer being different (and ugly). not sure how it'd work in this case. -mike