
23 Dec
2010
23 Dec
'10
5:40 p.m.
On 22.12.2010 08:52, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Dirk Behme,
In message4D11A65E.8040200@googlemail.com you wrote:
Btw, I tried to send a summary of our issues to the Codesourcery =
mailing list:
http://www.codesourcery.com/archives/arm-gnu/msg03989.html
Let's see if we get an answer.
You got one: http://www.codesourcery.com/archives/arm-gnu/msg03990.html
And it sounds like a reasonable explanation to me.
An additional answer, mainly covering the question why the volatile is optimized away:
http://www.codesourcery.com/archives/arm-gnu/msg03999.html
Best regards
Dirk