19 Aug
2013
19 Aug
'13
5:34 p.m.
On 08/13/2013 10:54 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 12:02 +0200, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
NAND_ECC_SOFT was the only option available while the SOFT_BCH option may also be used.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp valentin.longchamp@keymile.com
drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Acked-by: Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com
Is this for use with http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/168855/ or do you have a 2K-page NAND that requires more than 1 bit of ECC correction?
We have a 2K-page NAND but we have found out that we need more than 1 bit of ECC correction otherwise with some suppliers we sometimes see uncorrectable bitflips.
Valentin