
4 Aug
2011
4 Aug
'11
10:14 p.m.
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 4E3AF62B.8080605@freescale.com you wrote:
Again, I think "nand hwfunc" conveys little information about what it's actually going to do, versus something like:
=> nandrbl off
I agree with Heiko that NAND related commands should be implemented as subcommands of the "nand" command.
Havong "nand <subcommand>" and "nandrbl" at the same time is not acceptable to me - that should be changed into "nand rbl".
At least "nand hwfunc type" or "nand hwfunc rbl" would be more informative, but I question the benefit that the verbosity buys us.
I agree that "hwfunc" is an unlucky name.
So now it's "nand hwfunc ctrl type rbl"? Just to avoid grepping for U_BOOT_CMD?
No. I would not like this either.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
War isn't a good life, but it's life.
-- Kirk, "A Private Little War", stardate 4211.8