On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
Hi Guennadi,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski lg@denx.de wrote:
Last time Scott Wood suggested to use nand_spl you replied "I think using nand_spl is the best approach, but it will needs more effort to complete." and "Anyway, right now we can have iMX31PDK booting with this code as an option for users willing to use U-Boot in this board." So, what's the status of this effort? If this your new submission, which still doesn't use nand_spl is not really targeted for upstream merge, I think, it would be better not to mark these mails "PATCH". Or have I missed anything?
This patch is just a rebase of previous patch, to be merged on u-boot-arm/master repository. I don't have nand_spl working until now.
I am new sending patches to u-boot mailing list. So what is the problem when calling it of "PATCH"? Please, let me know about my mistake, can you explain about it?
My understanding was, that the patch in this form, i.e., not using nand_spl should _not_ be accepted in the mainline and you sent it to the list just as a FYI for users willing to use your solution. That's why I suggested not to mark it as a "PATCH." I haven't followed discussions of your previous submissions of this patch very closely, so I might have missed something, but I would agree with Scott and wait until a nand_spl version of this patch appears, and _not_ apply this patch in its present form.
Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de