In message 41171E78.6070101@imc-berlin.de you wrote:
Accepted. I found some processor specific driver code in drivers/ (like s3c24x0_i2c.c s3c4510b_eth.c s3c4510b_eth.h s3c4510b_uart.c s3c4510b_uart.h) so I thought it becomes "common practice" to put peripheral
Yes - this has sneaked in because there was no better solution. Given the planned restructuring this belongs to cpu/XXX/ as well.
driver code for uart or ethernet (although it might be processor specific) into drivers/.
No, I don't want to have this. drivers/ is for common (processor independent) conde.
Be careful. Do you really think this is a good idea? The 52xx USB code suffers from the endinaess problem of the 52xx. I'm not sure if this is a good base for common code.
The only difference I found is
Agreed - so please use the MPC5200 version as base, not the other one.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk