Dear Albert & Stefano,
earlier today I posted a number of patches to remove some more dead ARM boards:
[PATCH 00/10] ARM board removal, next round http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107465 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107469 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107467 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107471 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107464 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107473 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107472 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107470 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107466 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107474
In addition, a number of other patches are neede to fix more build breakage on ARM, i. e.
09/05 Stefano Babic [PATCH V4] Makefile : fix generation of cpu related asm-offsets.h http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107505
09/05 Wolfgang Denk [PATCH] da8xxevm: Fix warning: unused variable 'val' http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107515
09/05 Wolfgang Denk [PATCH] omap24xx: fix 'reset_timer_masked' declaration error http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107521
09/05 Wolfgang Denk harmony: fix out of tree building http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/107526
08/30 Stefano Babic [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] MX31: fix missing mxc_get_clk() call http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/106825
08/30 Stefano Babic [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] I2C: mxc: fix compilation for MX31 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/106826
08/30 Stefano Babic [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: drop imx31_phycore from general Makefile http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/106827
08/30 Stefano Babic [PATCH 2/2] Makefile: remove mx31pdk exception http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/106828
And maybe some more.
Normally these should go through your iMX and ARM repositories. To save time and finally get a -rc1 out, I would like to pull these directly, if this is OK with you. As far as I can tell these re all straightforward fixes, without bigger impact on architectural things.
Do you agree?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk