Hi Heiko,
On 14 May 2015 at 04:51, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:37:40PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Tom,
Am 06.03.2015 08:24, schrieb Heiko Schocher:
Hello Tom,
Am 05.03.2015 15:50, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:46:50AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Tom,
Am 05.03.2015 07:22, schrieb Heiko Schocher:
Hello Tom,
Am 04.03.2015 17:40, schrieb Tom Rini: >On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:42:58AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>Hello Tom, >> >>Am 02.03.2015 14:59, schrieb Tom Rini: >>>On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 07:56:41AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>>>Hello Simon, >>>> >>>>Am 24.02.2015 14:31, schrieb Simon Glass: >>>>>Hi Heiko, >>>>> >>>>>On 23 February 2015 at 23:18, Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de wrote: >>>>>>a6b541b090: TI ARMv7: Don't use GD before crt0.S has set it >>>>>> >>>>>>moves the init of the debug uart at the very end of SPL code. >>>>>>Enable it for the siemens board earlier, as they print >>>>>>ddr settings ... all debug output before board_init_r() >>>>>>is here currently useless. Maybe we must rework this >>>>>>globally? >>>>> >>>>>Assuming we are talking about U-Boot proper, the DDR init should >>>>>happen in board_init_f(), specifically dram_init(). so I think this >>>>>code should be updated. >>>>> >>>>>If it is SPL, then DDR init should happen in SPL's board_init_f(). >>>> >>>>It is in SPL... >>>> >>>>sdram_init() is called from: >>>> >>>>./arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/board.c from s_init() ... >>>> >>>>>I sent a series a few weeks ago (available at u-boot-dm branch >>>>>spl-working) related to this topic: >>>>> >>>>>http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/ >>>> >>>>Ah ... Hmm... so "./arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/board.c" needs >>>>a rework, right? >>>> >>>>Is a simple rename s_init() -> board_init_f() correct? >>> >>>Right so, no, we can't just rename s_init to board_init_f. This is what >>>I was talking about in the thread about the function Hans wants to add >>>to enable some bits in CP15 on sunxi, iirc. >>> >>>In short, armv7 has a different set of abstraction hooks than the >>>previous ARM cores (armv8 followed what we have for v7) and I'm not >>>convinced in the end that it really won us anything. See >>>http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-January/202350.html >>> >>>For today you need to rework the Siemens code to print out the DDR >>>values (when desired) in spl_board_init() as we do not, or will not >>>shortly, have gd prior to board_init_f running. >> >>Hmm... first I thought, ok, no problem, move the output from the RAM >>parameters to spl_board_init() ... but thats only the half of the >>story ... They read the RAM parameters from an i2c eeprom, and if >>there are errors, they print this errors ... currently this does >>not work, and thats I think the more important case ... and I could >>not move this error printfs to somewhere, because if RAM is not >>working ... there is no later ... >> >>So I have to enable the console early ... maybe I missed something, >>but this worked fine in the past (and I think we should not break >>this, as this is an essential feature). > >OK, I missed something too. I think this gets better now once I merge >Simon's SPL series as we do all of this from board_init_f() and the >siemens code should just work again.
Yes, just saw your patch ;-)
If they are in mainline (or do you have them somewhere in a git repo?), I test it again on the dxr2 board, thanks!
If I am correct, all needed patches from you are in mainline, just tried this on the dxr2 board ... but I still need:
diff --git a/board/siemens/common/board.c b/board/siemens/common/board.c index a39cbd0..8724604 100644 --- a/board/siemens/common/board.c +++ b/board/siemens/common/board.c @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ void set_uart_mux_conf(void)
void set_mux_conf_regs(void) {
/* enable early the console */gd->baudrate = CONFIG_BAUDRATE;serial_init();gd->have_console = 1;/* Initalize the board header */ enable_i2c0_pin_mux(); i2c_set_bus_num(0);to see the console output ...
Yes, if you want console prior to spl_board_init() then you need to do that where you are.
Ah, ok... so this patch is OK?
Just found this thread again, as I want to post updates for the am335x based siemens boards ... Is this patch [1] Ok, and can get applied?
Thanks!
bye, Heiko [1] Patchwork [U-Boot] am33xx, spl, siemens: enable debug uart output again https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/446644/
Hups... found this patch in patchwork marked as RFC and Delegated to me ... ?
I'll look it over again then, thanks.
It's a bit confusing - am I right in thinking that this is called from board_early_init_f() in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/board.c? That in turn is called from board_init_f() in the same file?
If so it seems OK, although I wonder if the SPL console setup could happen in board_early_init_f() or even board_init_f() rather than being buried so deep? It seems odd that setting up the mux registers should enable the console, and I doubt people will find it easily.
Regards, Simon