On 6/24/05, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Grrrrghhhh...
I really don't understand what's going on. Is my English so poor? Am I completely unable to express myself clearly enough?
I apologize...
This is the third time I repeat the same request, and two different people continue to either misunderstand or ignore me.
Did I ignore you ?! Are you talking about my "lost mail", sent to this mailing list the first of June (take a look at gmane archive) ?
I do not want to see any binary images. I want to compare the System.map and the u-boot.map files between the working and the non working versions.
What is so difficult about that?
I believed system.map and the u-boot.map contain only the symbol table, so I thought binaries contain more helpful data (since the symbol table can be read from these, with readelf or nm).
I will send you these 'map' files next week.
A lot of maybes here. I would like to see facts first. FOr example, the diff between the linke r maps and/or the binaries.
Facts are in the provided binairies, so what's the problem ?
And please don't top-post / full-quote.
OK.
I think I give up on this. If you cannot provide the information I need I cannot help you.
My first mail was not a "help request" nor a "bug report" since I don't know where the bug comes from (GCC ?, LD ?, U-Boot ?). I sent this first mail to help U-Boot users who have the same problem, it was the only purpose. So, please, stop to blame me !
I would like to thank you for your awesome work, and I know you are very busy. So you can give up on this (tell me if so, please), there is no problem.
Best regards, Cedric VINCENT.