
17 Apr
2016
17 Apr
'16
11:55 p.m.
Hi!
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name, but no reg property
I don't know who produces the warnings, but perhaps fix the tool, instead?
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ #size-cells = <1>; chosen { }; aliases { };
- memory { device_type = "memory"; reg = <0 0>; };
- memory@0 { device_type = "memory"; reg = <0 0>; };
};
This does not look like an improvement to me...
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ compatible = "fixed-clock"; };
main_pll: main_pll {
main_pll: main_pll@40 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; #clock-cells = <0>;
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ clocks = <&osc1>; reg = <0x40>;
mpuclk: mpuclk {
mpuclk: mpuclk@48 { #clock-cells = <0>; compatible = "altr,socfpga-perip-clk"; clocks = <&main_pll>;
Neither do these, actually. So we have clock at fixed addresses. Why is it wrong?
@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ reg = <0xffd05000 0x1000>; };
usbphy0: usbphy@0 {
usbphy0: usbphy { #phy-cells = <0>; compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv"; status = "okay";
And this sounds like a bug waiting to happen..
Best regards, Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html