17 Jun
2012
17 Jun
'12
6:03 p.m.
Dear Otavio Salvador,
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de wrote:
return "unknown";
return "<unidentified>";Taste ist taste... but why <unidentified> is better that unknown ?
For me it gives a visual indication that we didn't meant to support a i.MXunknown processor ;-) i.MX<unidentified> make it easy to spot this.
But really, I don't mind it being included or not. I did it because Marek has comment about it when looking at my initial mx23 patches.
And I like it more, it looks less like a typo.
Best regards, Marek Vasut