On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:30:23PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
2016-12-28 17:12 GMT+09:00 Oded Gabbay oded.gabbay@gmail.com:
In the tiny-printf implementation, there is no support for %# and/or %l. This patch checks if CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF is defined and if so, prints a different debug statement which doesn't use %#l
Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay oded.gabbay@gmail.com Cc: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
common/spl/spl.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c index f7df834..23dfa2d 100644 --- a/common/spl/spl.c +++ b/common/spl/spl.c @@ -385,9 +385,14 @@ void board_init_r(gd_t *dummy1, ulong dummy2) debug("Unsupported OS image.. Jumping nevertheless..\n"); } #if defined(CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN) && !defined(CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE) +#ifdef CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF
debug("SPL malloc() used 0x%x bytes (%d KB)\n",(uint) gd->malloc_ptr, (uint) gd->malloc_ptr / 1024);+#else debug("SPL malloc() used %#lx bytes (%ld KB)\n", gd->malloc_ptr, gd->malloc_ptr / 1024); #endif +#endif
Please do not patch around with CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF.
What you need to do is to fix tiny_printf() implementation.
That was the first suggestion, but that adds to the tiny printf size. I would say we just re-write the code here to always print correctly for TINY_PRINTF (and further, in this specific case print bytes or KB, not both, and preferably just bytes).