Hi Lars,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lars,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lars,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Lars Poeschel poeschel@lemonage.de wrote:
Hi Joe,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:03:59AM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote:
I beat you to it: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-May/214261.html
Well, ... ok. You won ;-) Your patchset is by far more comprehensive than mine. If I see this right in the archives, you did not receive any comments since nearly a month.
That is true. I really would like a little feedback on it... or maybe I can just drop the controversial one and only include these things... they seem to be mostly straightforward.
This was RFC will you resend this as a "real" PATCH ?
Yes.
Could you then include two of the dependencies from my patches: I think CMD_UBI has to depend on MTD_PARTITIONS and obivously CMD_UBIFS
I noticed when adding MTD_PARTITIONS that MTD_DEVICE is not moved over yet. Do you know what the dependency relationship is there? If not I'll dig into it a bit.
has to depend on CMD_UBI.
Will do.
I saw no action from you on this one. Can I help out - at least for the decompression / ubi / ubifs part ?
Sorry about that... the end of last release got a little crazy.
I think the setexpr / env location parts from your patchset can then go in as seperate patches.
I agree. I'll split them apart and send these out.
I haven't forgotten about this... I plan to get this sent out this week.
I had this ready to go, but conflicts with https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/508134/, so I'm gonna have to regenerate the moves after that goes in.
-Joe