pá 7. 10. 2022 v 11:33 odesílatel Michal Simek monstr@monstr.eu napsal:
On 10/4/22 07:46, Venkatesh Yadav Abbarapu wrote:
board.c defines zynq_board_read_rom_ethaddr(), but neglected to include its declaration, causing the following sparse and compile time warnings:
board/xilinx/common/board.c:56:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'zynq_board_read_rom_ethaddr' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Include asm/arch/sys_proto.h, which includes the missing declaration.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Yadav Abbarapu venkatesh.abbarapu@amd.com
board/xilinx/common/board.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/board/xilinx/common/board.c b/board/xilinx/common/board.c index 9b4aded466..a822bcf53a 100644 --- a/board/xilinx/common/board.c +++ b/board/xilinx/common/board.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include <log.h> #include <asm/global_data.h> #include <asm/sections.h> +#include <asm/arch/sys_proto.h> #include <dm/uclass.h> #include <i2c.h> #include <linux/sizes.h>
I have removed this patch from my queue because versal and versal-net doesn't have this header that's why CI loop is failing. I think it would be better to remove zynq_board_read_rom_ethaddr() completely because none is using xlnx,eeprom anyway.
Thanks, Michal