
4 Nov
2013
4 Nov
'13
1:03 p.m.
Hi Marek,
On 04/11/2013 12:50, Marek Vasut wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Hi Marek,
On 02/11/2013 18:23, Marek Vasut wrote:
if (!timeout) {
debug("MXS I2C: Failed receiving data!\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
This is a real error and not a debug information. IMHO it should be better to print the error unconditionally with puts/printf, reporting that the timer elapsed.
Returning -EINVAL will make the i2c stack trigger an output, so having it duplicated here is pointless I believe.
Agree on that. But then, should we not return -ETIMEDOUT (-110) ? We should print the error code in the i2c stack (do_i2c_read) instead of checking only if the return value is not null, as we do now.
Best regards, Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic@denx.de
=====================================================================