Hi Tom,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 1:31 AM Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:57:09PM +0530, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 8:46 PM Rayagonda Kokatanur rayagonda.kokatanur@broadcom.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 7:11 PM Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:08:12PM +0530, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote:
From: Srinath Mannam srinath.mannam@broadcom.com
Add support for stingray PAXB PHY controller driver. This driver supports maximum 8 PAXB phys using pipemux data.
Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam srinath.mannam@broadcom.com Signed-off-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur rayagonda.kokatanur@broadcom.com Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de
Changes from v2: -Address review comments from Stefan Roese, Rearrange the include files. Remove dm/device.h as its included part of dm.h.
Changes from v1: -Address review comments from Stefan Roese, Use GENMASK() instead of hard code value. Remove unwanted struct declaration. Get pr_err() into single line.
drivers/phy/Kconfig | 7 ++ drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 + drivers/phy/phy-bcm-sr-pcie.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The patch itself is fine but I think shows another problem. Can you please add a patch that lists something relevant in the top-level MAINTAINERS file and list this and all of the other drivers, etc, that wouldn't just be listed in the board MAINATINERS file? Thanks!
I have a plan to update the top level MAINTAINER file with all new driver and board files in a separate patch. Hope this is fine, please let me know.
OK, thanks. I'll be picking up more patches again soon for -next.
Could you please pick this patch. If any further review comments, please let me know.
Best regards, Rayagonda
-- Tom