On 19:14-20231002, Roger Quadros wrote: [...]
Please see suggestion by Massimo here https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAC928HY2rZoz6L8za+L20GAsbJCBYOe+k75L_N3aE-78smn...
Do you agree we should change this series to use bootph-some-ram instead?
Actually I dont like usage of bootph-some-ram as a hack. We dont have any DDR in the initial stages of R5 SPL. I'd rather stick with bootph-all and pre-ram which is accurate for the staged boot sequence we are following.
Further, boot-ph-all and pre-ram is already the direction we are moving in kernel dts to make syncs easier in the future. unless there is a strong reasoning on an alternate rationale, i'd rather not mess with the flow in play already.
Personally though, I am miffed at a breaking change of this form :(