On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 09:18 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 3/7/19 8:51 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 13:12 -0600, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
Curious, you sent out 3 versions(2x v10, and v11) within ~2 hours. What versions should we be reviewing?
2nd version of v10 was resent quickly after request from Dalon to change the node names. I have comment on the 1st version v10 cover letter to void the whole series since no review starting yet.
After that, Marek told me to resend in v11.
That is not true, I merely asked whether the v10 that was reposted is actually v11 .
Ohh...sorry for misunderstanding, i thought you was asking me to resend v11 if there are any changes on v10.
Sorry for any confusion, please help to review v11, this series of patches mainly resolved some comments from Simek on [v9]: https://w ww.m ail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg316086.html and node names changed on patch [2/9]
On 3/5/19 10:23 AM, tien.fong.chee@intel.com wrote:
From: Tien Fong Chee tien.fong.chee@intel.com
This patch adds description on properties about file name used for both peripheral bitstream and core bitstream.
Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee tien.fong.chee@intel.com