Hi Andy,
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 06:58, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 05:12:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
This file is potentially useful to other architectures saddled with ACPI so move most of its contents to a common location.
It's not just potentially, it's definitely useful. But this makes me think, why we don't incorporate ACPICA headers as is?
Due to code style and the vast amount of unused code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Wolfgang Wallner wolfgang.wallner@br-automation.com
Changes in v3:
- Add forward declarations for the functions
- Move acpi_table.h to include/acpi
- Update commit message to say that we move most of its contents
Changes in v2: None
arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/acpi.c | 2 +- arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c | 2 +- arch/x86/cpu/quark/acpi.c | 2 +- arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c | 4 +- arch/x86/include/asm/acpi_table.h | 381 +---------------------------- arch/x86/lib/acpi.c | 2 +- arch/x86/lib/acpi_s3.c | 2 +- arch/x86/lib/acpi_table.c | 2 +- arch/x86/lib/tables.c | 2 +- arch/x86/lib/zimage.c | 2 +- include/acpi/acpi_table.h | 394 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/efi_loader/efi_acpi.c | 2 +- 12 files changed, 412 insertions(+), 385 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/acpi/acpi_table.h
Regards, Simon