Hi Rajeshwari.
2012/8/2 Rajeshwari Shinde rajeshwari.s@samsung.com:
SMDK EVT1 has a different Winbond part, added its part details to the SPI flash table
Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan a.kesavan@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde rajeshwari.s@samsung.com
Changes in V2: - Corrected the commit message. Changes in V3: - None. Changes in V4: - Rebased on Mainline u-boot.git. drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c index 427b71f..ae4e48a 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c @@ -62,6 +62,14 @@ static const struct winbond_spi_flash_params winbond_spi_flash_table[] = { .nr_blocks = 256, .name = "W25Q128", },
{.id = 0x5014,.l2_page_size = 8,.pages_per_sector = 16,.sectors_per_block = 16,
Above three fields is removed from commit a4ed3b653163367628d4ad173dfe3faf388da0ac, but in spi_flash_probe_winbond()
flash->page_size = 4096;
original codes are
/* Assuming power-of-two page size initially. */ page_size = 1 << params->l2_page_size; ... flash->page_size = page_size;
so i think flash->page_size is 256 or (1 << 8).
When flash->page_size is 4096, is your spi_flash device working well?
.nr_blocks = 128,.name = "W25Q80",},};
struct spi_flash *spi_flash_probe_winbond(struct spi_slave *spi, u8 *idcode)
1.7.4.4
U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Thanks.