On Tuesday, November 04, 2014 at 01:56:41 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Hi!
R8A7793 has same IP of USB controller as R8A7791 and R8A7794 of rmobile ARM SoCs. This adds support R8A7793 to EHCI HCD of rmobile.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com
drivers/usb/host/ehci-rmobile.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-rmobile.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-rmobile.c index 0d1a726..a89f04b 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-rmobile.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-rmobile.c @@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ static u32 usb_base_address[CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT] = { 0xEE080000, /* USB0 (EHCI) */ 0xEE0C0000, /* USB1 */ }; +#elif defined(CONFIG_R8A7793) +static u32 usb_base_address[CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT] = {
- 0xEE080000, /* USB0 (EHCI) */
- 0xEE0C0000, /* USB1 */
+};
I see you combined those three arrays in the next patch, thanks!
#elif defined(CONFIG_R8A7794) static u32 usb_base_address[CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT] = { 0xEE080000, /* USB0 (EHCI) */
btw. just an idea, but you don't need to explicitly use usb_base_address[CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT], you can just use usb_base_address[] in the array definition. Then, in the code, you can just use "ARRAY_SIZE(usb_base_address) - 1" instead of CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT . This rids you of one annoying macro in that driver ;-) If you want to implement this, then please do so, but in a separate patch.
I'll pick these two patches now.
Thanks!
Best regards, Marek Vasut