Hi Jagan, Vignesh,
On mar., oct. 01, 2024 at 18:06, Neil Armstrong neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote:
To smoothly handle the transition from the legacy SPI FLASH API to the the driver model API, add the DM functions as dummy inline functions.
Today, client code uses #if/#else conditionals, but it's better to use if(IS_ENABLED()) to make sure all code builds fine and avoid configuration hell, leaving the compiler remove the dead code.
An example is cmd/sf, which could make use of those dummy functions to drop the conditional compilation.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong neil.armstrong@linaro.org
I'd like to submit this through u-boot-dfu but before that i'd prefer to have an Acked-by from one of you.
Any opinion on this ?
Thank you for your time!
include/spi_flash.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/spi_flash.h b/include/spi_flash.h index 10d19fd4b11..2e703e85250 100644 --- a/include/spi_flash.h +++ b/include/spi_flash.h @@ -139,6 +139,40 @@ int sandbox_sf_bind_emul(struct sandbox_state *state, int busnum, int cs, void sandbox_sf_unbind_emul(struct sandbox_state *state, int busnum, int cs);
#else +/* Compatibility functions for when DM_SPI_FLASH is disabled */ +static inline int spi_flash_probe_bus_cs(unsigned int busnum, unsigned int cs,
struct udevice **devp)+{
- return -ENODEV;
+}
+static inline int spi_flash_read_dm(struct udevice *dev, u32 offset, size_t len,
void *buf)+{
- return -ENODEV;
+}
+static inline int spi_flash_write_dm(struct udevice *dev, u32 offset, size_t len,
const void *buf)+{
- return -ENODEV;
+}
+static inline int spi_flash_erase_dm(struct udevice *dev, u32 offset, size_t len) +{
- return -ENODEV;
+}
+static inline int spl_flash_get_sw_write_prot(struct udevice *dev) +{
- return -ENODEV;
+}
+static inline int spi_flash_std_probe(struct udevice *dev) +{
- return -ENODEV;
+}
struct spi_flash *spi_flash_probe(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs, unsigned int max_hz, unsigned int spi_mode);
-- 2.34.1